877 BAIL BOND
Call toll free 877-224-5266
By Tonya Page-Rynerson
Bail is a Constitutional right – staying out on bail is not. The right to bail allows the defendant to continue with their normal life, work and family while preparing for the case. Without bail, “innocent until proven guilty” would mean nothing. With bail amounts in California regularly set at $20,000 and up, when someone gets arrested, they usually turn to a bail bondsman to get them out of jail. At a fee of 10% of the full bail amount, the price of freedom is affordable for most people. Innocent or guilty, get arrested, pay the bondsman and you’re free to go where you want, when you want, and do what you want – at least until your Court date.
Not so fast. There's no such thing as absolute freedom when someone is out on bail. Courts set requirements (called "terms of release") when a defendant is released on bail. The bail bond contract may impose additional requirements. If a defendant doesn’t follow the terms of his release, the bail bondsman can – and will – revoke the bail and return the person to jail.
The defendant loses a lot when that happens: his freedom, the bail bond fee, and possibly the opportunity to be released on bail in the future.
In California, a bail agent takes responsibility for the defendant: by law the bondsman becomes the defendant’s jailer. Because of this, bail bond companies are allowed to revoke a bond in certain circumstances. It can happen when the defendant either doesn't fulfill his Court-ordered responsibilities, becomes a serious “flight risk” (meaning there is a high probability they plan to evade the Court) or the defendant simply doesn't follow the agreement made with the bondsman in exchange for bail.
Although every state has different regulations, they all allow bail bondsmen to revoke bonds and return defendants to jail. The Court itself can also revoke bail if the person is found to be violating the terms of release. Here are a few recent examples from the news:
Failure to follow the terms of the bail contract
Violating the Court's terms of release
Risky personal conduct. These types of situations aren't nearly as cut-and-dried. It's easy to tell when someone has traveled out of state, contacted witnesses, or otherwise clearly violated Court-ordered terms or a clause in a bail bond contract. But, in cases where the defendant out on bail engages in risky, or even illegal activities, the bail bondsman may decide to revoke bail in order to lessen his financial exposure.
In one of the few cases where our company has revoked bail, we had written a bail bond contract for a defendant who was already out on a bond for another case with another company. When he failed to appear in Court on that case and did not return our calls, we revoked the bail bond he had with us. Not only was he violating the law by failing to appear, but we had reasonable doubt that he would appear on our case.
When a bail bondsman writes a bond, he's stepping into the role of jailer and is responsible for the defendant. Reputable bail bond companies are very careful when writing bonds, because the potential financial exposure is so great. If a defendant skips out on a $50,000 bond, the bondsman has to either catch the person (which can be expensive) and return him to Court or pay the entire bond amount.
Most states have laws that specify when bail can and cannot be revoked. In California, there are two common circumstances where many people mistakenly assume that a bail bondsman can revoke bail:
For instance, we had someone call us who had guaranteed a bond with another company. She had bailed out her husband on a drug charge and discovered later that he was using drugs again. She wanted the bail company to pick him up and return him to jail, but they refused to do it; there just wasn't evidence that he was a flight risk nor could the bail company know for certain that he was using drugs.
Her best option was to call the police herself and report him. If he was arrested again while out on bail, there would have been a more legitimate reason to revoke the first bond. Or perhaps the Court would have refused to release him a second time.
When bail is revoked, the defendant or the indemnitor who guaranteed the bail bond has paid the bail bond fee and the defendant is back in jail. The bail bond money is lost. Remember that the bail fee is part of the bail bond contract. By the contract, the fee is fully earned when defendant is initially released from jail. It's paid whether the defendant is charged, convicted, has all charges dropped, or has bail revoked.
If the terms of the agreement are violated while out on bail and either the Court or bail bondsman revokes the bond, the bail company isn't obligated to refund the bail fee. If you want to be released on bond again, that requires a new bail contract and bail fee. That can be an expensive situation.
For instance, the defendant from Spokane mentioned previously, was released twice on bail set at $250,000. Two separate bail contracts require two separate bail fee payments of $25,000 each. That's a lot of money to come up with even once, much less twice.
That's assuming the Court will approve bond a second time. In many cases, Courts are reluctant to release a defendant on bond again, so the defendant can be in the uncomfortable situation of owing the bail fee while he sits in jail waiting for trial. In other cases, the Court will allow bail, but increase the amount.
It's important to fully understand both the terms of release set by the Court and the terms of the bail bond contract. Otherwise, the defendant could inadvertently break the rules and end up the last place he wants to be – back in a jail cell.